This entry will serve as the springboard for discussions related to HW3:
As you embark on homework 3, it is within the context of ALL of the information you have previsously collected (questionaires, interviews, observations, records, ecological observations, etc.), plus one full session using the ABC observation form.
Description of setting: Here you will use information from the first part of HW1 along with additional descriptions of variables from the ecological form and interviews...here, it's okay to provide as much relevant information as possible.
Antecedents: Here, provide a discussion on factors (activities, demands, difficult tasks, uninteresting tasks, alone time, lack of attention, room too noisy, too much visual stimuli, etc.) that may be prompting the problem behavior...there may be more than one variable in play here...
Operational Definition: Use topography and at least one dimension from HW1...approved by Dr. A....and that you've refined in HW2 (detailed numbers related to the data you collected)
Consequence(s): Here, provide a description of what may be maintaining (positive or negative reinforcement) the problem behavior (based on ALL data you've gathered to this point). It is important to note that some behaviors may have multiple functions...
Time and day: The data you collected should provide some info on the day(s) and time(s) that increases the probability that the problem behavior may occur...if the data supports the notion that it is not the time or day as much as certain activities, it is appropriate to discuss that in this section.
Testable Explanation: Here you must discuss your testable explanation related to the problem behavior (hypothesis statement). This statement must be written in Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC) format. An example of a testable explanation might be:
* When the student is given a difficult math assignment involving fractions (antecedent), the student engages in off task behaviors (behavior), which results in the student avoiding/delaying the task (consequence).
[Independent Variable = blue; Dependent Variable = Red].
This same testable explanation can be written for the replacement behavior as follows (assuming that the antecedent is NOT being modified, i.e., not being given tasks that are appropriate to student's performance level). It is important to note that the consequence of the problem behavior was negative reinforcement...this means that the replacement behavior MUST achieve the same FUNCTION:
* When the student is given a difficult math assignment involving fractions (antecedent), the student will engage in {a} requesting alternate assignment, {b} asking for break, or {c} asking for help (behavior), which results in the student avoiding/delaying/eliminating the task (consequence).
[Independent Variable = blue; Dependent Variable = Red].
Here's another testable explanation for the replacement behavior that the modifies the antecedent by providing the student tasks that are appropriate to student's performance level. Again, the consequence of the problem behavior was negative reinforcement...this means that even though you've modified the antecedent, once the student engages in the desired behavior (performing the task), the reinforcement MUST result in a similar FUNCTION (negative reinforcement):
* When the student is given a math assignment involving fractions at his ability level and with teacher support (antecedent), the student will engage in the assigned math task (behavior), which results in the student receiving some sort of negative reinforcement [free time, homework pass, etc] (consequence).
[Independent Variable = blue; Dependent Variable = Red].
Testing Strategy: Here you must provide a detailed description of the variable you plan on manipulating to determine of your hypothesis statement is correct.
* MANIPULATING THE ANTECEDENT: The last testable explanation noted above is a perfect example of how the antecedent is going to be modified by making sure that the curriculum is at the student's ability level and teacher support (a clear description of what that means is required)...to determine if indeed the hypothesis that difficult math tasks involving fractions truly is the ANTECEDENT to the problem behavior.
* MANIPULATING THE CONSEQUENCE: Another example is the testable explanation above that speaks to teaching the student the replacement behaviors [{a} requesting alternate assignment, {b} asking for break, or {c} asking for help] that allow him to still delay/avoid the task which will allow you to test your hypothesis that the student engages in the problem behavior to escape/avoid/delay an undesired behavior (CONSEQUENCE).
I hope this information helps...